Ali Mohamadian; l m
Abstract
The legitimacy of the testimony of the martyrdom, which is also referred to in the jurisprudence's literature as "the subordinate body", is a definite matter in jurisprudential teachings; Be careful. The reflection of this jurisprudential theory can be seen in Article 1320 BC: "Testimony to testimony ...
Read More
The legitimacy of the testimony of the martyrdom, which is also referred to in the jurisprudence's literature as "the subordinate body", is a definite matter in jurisprudential teachings; Be careful. The reflection of this jurisprudential theory can be seen in Article 1320 BC: "Testimony to testimony is sufficient if it witnesses the principle of death or by any other obstacle such as illness, travel, imprisonment, etc." The provisions of this article, which confirms the famous acceptance of the Imamite jurisprudents, are in fact an assignment to the public and information of authority and infidelity (testimony). The present article, after examining the roots of the famous view, has found two major reasons for this: the alleged consensus as well as the transcriptive documentation of Bob. Research results show that the consensus is due to opposition from the predecessors of the unfinished companions and is at least likely to return to other Shari'a documents; the validity of the evidence cited is in addition to the weakness of the document, in part to deal with some other news Bob, who is considered to be valid according to the rules of the Reichali, is in conflict with, and ultimately assuming, the conflict
